DriveSize

2015 Tesla Model X vs 2018 Jeep Wrangler

Side view of the 2015 Tesla Model X
Side view of the 2018 Jeep Wrangler

Tesla Model X

2015

Jeep Wrangler

2018

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2015 Tesla Model X or 2018 Jeep Wrangler?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

At 81.5 cm longer, 2015 Tesla Model X sits well ahead of 2018 Jeep Wrangler in terms of body length. The 2015 Tesla Model X gains you 12.4 cm in width, likely providing extra elbow room inside compared to the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, but you'll need more caution when navigating tight city streets. With a 18.4 cm height advantage, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler is better suited for those who prefer a higher view of the road ahead. With a 7.5 cm advantage in ground clearance, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler is better equipped for unpaved roads and snowy conditions when compared to the 2015 Tesla Model X. Rear legroom in the 2015 Tesla Model X should be superior to the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, thanks to that 50.5 cm wheelbase increase.

Measurements

Length

505.2 cm (+81.5)

423.7 cm

Height

168.4 cm

186.8 cm (+18.4)

Body width

199.9 cm (+12.4)

187.5 cm

Width including mirrors

227.1 cm

N/A

Ground clearance

17.1 cm

24.6 cm (+7.5)

Wheelbase

296.5 cm (+50.5)

246 cm

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

10.1 m² (+2.2)

7.9 m²

How each car compares with its class average

Length

505.2 cm

52.6 cm longer than the average Crossover

423.7 cm

71.7 cm shorter than the average SUV

Height

168.4 cm

5.6 cm taller than the average Crossover

186.8 cm

3.3 cm shorter than the average SUV

Body width

199.9 cm

15 cm wider than the average Crossover

187.5 cm

8.2 cm narrower than the average SUV

Width including mirrors

227.1 cm

20.7 cm wider than the average Crossover

N/A

Ground clearance

17.1 cm

1 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover

24.6 cm

2.1 cm more ground clearance than the average SUV

Wheelbase

296.5 cm

24.1 cm longer wheelbase than the average Crossover

246 cm

44.1 cm shorter wheelbase than the average SUV

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

10.1 m²

1.7 m² larger footprint than the average Crossover

7.9 m²

1.8 m² smaller footprint than the average SUV

Front view

Front view of the 2015 Tesla Model X
Front view of the 2018 Jeep Wrangler

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

The 2015 Tesla Model X’s confirmed 357 L (SAE) capacity is below average for its class, serving as our primary reference point for this matchup. The 2015 Tesla Model X's 2,166 L (SAE) capacity with the seats down is way above average for its segment.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

357 L

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

2,166 L

N/A

Frunk capacity

187 L

N/A

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

196 L per m

N/A

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

98 L per m²

N/A

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

357 L

382 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

2,166 L

295 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

DriveSize space efficiency

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.

-25%

SAE: Less space efficient than the average Crossover

Rear view

Rear view of the 2015 Tesla Model X
Rear view of the 2018 Jeep Wrangler

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

The 2018 Jeep Wrangler trades the extra access points of the 2015 Tesla Model X for a more cohesive and solid body design with just 2 doors. Opting for the 2015 Tesla Model X greatly expands your passenger options, thanks to its 3-seat advantage over the 2018 Jeep Wrangler. When comparing the two, the 2015 Tesla Model X is much less suited to tight city centers, requiring a full 1.8 m more room to U-turn than the 2018 Jeep Wrangler.

Measurements

Doors

5 (+3)

2

Max. seats

7 (+3)

4

Turning circle

12.3 m (+1.8)

10.5 m

Curb weight

N/A

1,801 kg

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

12.3 m

1.1 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover

10.5 m

1.5 m smaller turning circle than the average SUV

Curb weight

N/A

1,801 kg

646 kg lighter than the average SUV

DriveSize manoeuvrability

DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.

-11%

Less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

+15%

More manoeuvrable than the average SUV

Parking

Will the 2015 Tesla Model X or 2018 Jeep Wrangler fit in a standard parking space?

2015 Tesla Model X parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 37.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 22 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

37.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

22 cm

2018 Jeep Wrangler parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 43.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 63 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

43.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

63 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize •

Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Tesla and Jeep documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.