DriveSize

1962 Peel P50 vs 2017 Tesla Model 3

Side view of the 2017 Tesla Model 3
Side view of the 1962 Peel P50

Peel P50

1962

Tesla Model 3

2017

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 1962 Peel P50 or 2017 Tesla Model 3?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

The figures show over 332.3 cm of separation between the 2017 Tesla Model 3 and 1962 Peel P50, which is a huge difference. The 2017 Tesla Model 3 is an incredible 85.9 cm wider, making the 1962 Peel P50 look like a toy in comparison. The 2017 Tesla Model 3 towers in height over the 1962 Peel P50 by 24.5 cm, providing a much more commanding view of any traffic ahead. Both cars are tuned for a similar ride height, despite the 2017 Tesla Model 3’s 1.3 cm ground clearance advantage. The 2017 Tesla Model 3 and 1962 Peel P50 exist at opposite ends of the spectrum, separated by a huge 167.5 cm wheelbase gap.

Measurements

Length

137.2 cm

469.5 cm (+332.3)

Height

120 cm

144.5 cm (+24.5)

Body width

99.1 cm

185 cm (+85.9)

Width including mirrors

N/A

208.8 cm

Ground clearance

12.7 cm

14 cm (+1.3)

Wheelbase

120 cm

287.5 cm (+167.5)

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

1.4 m²

8.7 m² (+7.3)

How each car compares with its class average

Length

137.2 cm

161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar

469.5 cm

3.4 cm shorter than the average Sedan

Height

120 cm

36 cm shorter than the average Microcar

144.5 cm

1.3 cm shorter than the average Sedan

Body width

99.1 cm

48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar

185 cm

2 cm wider than the average Sedan

Width including mirrors

N/A

208.8 cm

3.2 cm wider than the average Sedan

Ground clearance

12.7 cm

1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar

14 cm

Same ground clearance as the average Sedan

Wheelbase

120 cm

86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar

287.5 cm

9.4 cm longer wheelbase than the average Sedan

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

1.4 m²

3.1 m² smaller footprint than the average Microcar

8.7 m²

0 m² larger footprint than the average Sedan

Front view

Front view of the 1962 Peel P50
Front view of the 2017 Tesla Model 3

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

The 2017 Tesla Model 3 features a 561 L (SAE) boot with the seats up, which is above average for its category.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

561 L

Frunk capacity

N/A

88 L

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

561 L

165 L more cargo volume than the average Sedan

Rear view

Rear view of the 1962 Peel P50
Rear view of the 2017 Tesla Model 3

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

The 2017 Tesla Model 3 offers more practicality with its 4 doors compared to the 1-door layout of the 1962 Peel P50. This is an all-out victory for passenger space; the 2017 Tesla Model 3 seats 4 additional passengers than the 1962 Peel P50. The 1962 Peel P50 can practically turn on a sixpence compared to the 2017 Tesla Model 3, which is hampered by a 7.9 m wider turning circle.

Measurements

Doors

1

4 (+3)

Max. seats

1

5 (+4)

Turning circle

3.7 m

11.6 m (+7.9)

Curb weight

59 kg

N/A

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

3.7 m

4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar

11.6 m

0.5 m larger turning circle than the average Sedan

Curb weight

59 kg

643 kg lighter than the average Microcar

N/A

DriveSize manoeuvrability

DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.

+2%

More manoeuvrable than the average Microcar

-4%

Less manoeuvrable than the average Sedan

Parking

Will the 1962 Peel P50 or 2017 Tesla Model 3 fit in a standard parking space?

1962 Peel P50 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

Comfortable

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

87.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

206 cm

2017 Tesla Model 3 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 45 cm per side, and length clearance is 40 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

45 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

40 cm

Articles featuring these cars

View all

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize •

Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Peel and Tesla documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.