DriveSize

2025 Toyota Corolla Cross vs 1962 Peel P50

Side view of the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross
Side view of the 1962 Peel P50

Toyota Corolla Cross

2025

Peel P50

1962

Side view of the 1962 Peel P50
Change car

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross or 1962 Peel P50?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

Measuring 308.8 cm longer than the 1962 Peel P50, the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross is a substantially larger vehicle that will require much more care in comparison when navigating tight car parks. The 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross is an incredible 83.4 cm wider, making the 1962 Peel P50 look like a toy in comparison. Height heavily favours the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross, which measures 42 cm taller than the 1962 Peel P50. The 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross is a massive 144 cm longer in the wheelbase, offering a vast interior compared to the 1962 Peel P50.

Measurements

Length

446 cm (+308.8)

137.2 cm

Height

162 cm (+42)

120 cm

Width (excluding mirrors)

182.5 cm (+83.4)

99.1 cm

Ground clearance

N/A (+144)

12.7 cm

Wheelbase

264 cm (+6.8)

120 cm

How each car compares with its class average

Length

446 cm

6.6 cm shorter than the average Crossover

137.2 cm

161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar

Height

162 cm

0.8 cm shorter than the average Crossover

120 cm

36 cm shorter than the average Microcar

Width (excluding mirrors)

182.5 cm

2.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover

99.1 cm

48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar

Ground clearance

N/A

12.7 cm

1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar

Wheelbase

264 cm

8.4 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover

120 cm

86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar

Front view

Front view of the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross
Front view of the 1962 Peel P50

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

The 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross features a 473 L (VDA) boot with the seats up, which is average for its category. The 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross is the only model in this pair with confirmed cargo stats, with a 1,404 L (VDA) capacity with the seats down that is way above average for its class.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

473 L

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,404 L

N/A

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

179.1 L per m

N/A

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

98.1 L per m²

N/A

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

473 L

28 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,404 L

104 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

DriveSize space efficiency score

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.

99%

VDA: below class average (-1%)

Rear view

Rear view of the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross
Rear view of the 1962 Peel P50

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

The 1-door 1962 Peel P50 means slightly less convenience for rear-seat access compared to the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross. There is a massive difference in cabin volume, as the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross accommodates up to 4 more people than the 1962 Peel P50. The 1962 Peel P50 is in a different league of agility, requiring a massive 6.74 m less space to turn than the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross. If efficiency and agility are your goals, the 1962 Peel P50’s 1,321 kg less weight is an extreme advantage.

Measurements

Doors

5 (+4)

1

Max. seats

5 (+4)

1

Turning circle

10.4 m (+6.7)

3.7 m

Curb weight

1,380 kg (+1,321)

59 kg

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

10.4 m

0.8 m smaller turning circle than the average Crossover

3.7 m

4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar

Curb weight

1,380 kg

252 kg lighter than the average Crossover

59 kg

643 kg lighter than the average Microcar

DriveSize manoeuvrability score

DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.

107%

7% more manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

102%

2% more manoeuvrable than the average Microcar

Parking

Will the 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross or 1962 Peel P50 fit in a standard parking space?

2025 Toyota Corolla Cross parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 46 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 52 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

46 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

52 cm

1962 Peel P50 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

Comfortable

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

87.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

206 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize