DriveSize

2016 Tesla Model S vs 2025 Ford Maverick

Side view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Side view of the 2016 Tesla Model S

Tesla Model S

2016

Ford Maverick

2025

Side view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Change car

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2016 Tesla Model S or 2025 Ford Maverick?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

At 10.5 cm shorter, the 2016 Tesla Model S could be the nimbler choice for city drivers compared to the 2025 Ford Maverick. The 2016 Tesla Model S gains you 12 cm in width, likely providing extra elbow room inside compared to the 2025 Ford Maverick, but you'll need more caution when navigating tight city streets. The roofline of the 2025 Ford Maverick is 29.5 cm higher than that of the 2016 Tesla Model S, making the contrast immediately noticeable. There’s a clear shift in capability here, with the 2025 Ford Maverick offering 7.1 cm more clearance than the 2016 Tesla Model S. The 2025 Ford Maverick offers 11.6 cm more between the tires thanks to its wheelbase advantage, which is usually a sign of a more spacious cabin.

Measurements

Length

497 cm

507.5 cm (+10.5)

Height

144.5 cm

174 cm (+29.5)

Width (excluding mirrors)

196.4 cm (+12)

184.4 cm

Width (including mirrors)

218.9 cm

212.1 cm (+7.1)

Ground clearance

14 cm

21.1 cm (+11.6)

Wheelbase

296 cm (+0.4)

307.6 cm

How each car compares with its class average

Length

497 cm

24.1 cm longer than the average Sedan

507.5 cm

35.2 cm shorter than the average Pickup

Height

144.5 cm

1.3 cm shorter than the average Sedan

174 cm

12.8 cm shorter than the average Pickup

Width (excluding mirrors)

196.4 cm

13.4 cm wider than the average Sedan

184.4 cm

10 cm narrower than the average Pickup

Width (including mirrors)

218.9 cm

13.3 cm wider than the average Sedan

212.1 cm

10.8 cm narrower than the average Pickup

Ground clearance

14 cm

Same ground clearance as the average Sedan

21.1 cm

1.7 cm less ground clearance than the average Pickup

Wheelbase

296 cm

17.9 cm longer wheelbase than the average Sedan

307.6 cm

23.4 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Pickup

Front view

Front view of the 2016 Tesla Model S
Front view of the 2025 Ford Maverick

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

Rarely do you see such a divide in cargo space. The 2025 Ford Maverick is the definitive winner for the weekly shop with the seats up, but the 2016 Tesla Model S is the undeniable master of maximum volume with the seats down.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

745 L

943 L (+198)

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,645 L (+702)

943 L

Frunk capacity

60 L

N/A

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

213.3 L per m (+27.4)

185.8 L per m

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

108.6 L per m² (+7.8)

100.8 L per m²

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

745 L

349 L more cargo volume than the average Sedan

943 L

494 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,645 L

Class benchmark unavailable.

943 L

584 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup

DriveSize space efficiency score

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.

82%

SAE: below class average (-18%)

Rear view

Rear view of the 2016 Tesla Model S
Rear view of the 2025 Ford Maverick

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

There is no difference in door count here, as both vehicles utilise a 4-door layout. You’ll find the same passenger limits in both models, as they each feature a 5-seat interior layout. The maneuverability is nearly the same, with the 2025 Ford Maverick holding a slim 0.1 m turning circle advantage. The 2016 Tesla Model S is 350 kg heavier than the 2025 Ford Maverick, a gap that can influence acceleration, cornering response, and running costs.

Measurements

Doors

4

4

Max. seats

5

5

Turning circle

12.3 m (+0.1)

12.2 m

Curb weight

2,027 kg (+350)

1,677 kg

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

12.3 m

1.2 m larger turning circle than the average Sedan

12.2 m

0.9 m smaller turning circle than the average Pickup

Curb weight

2,027 kg

505 kg heavier than the average Sedan

1,677 kg

574 kg lighter than the average Pickup

DriveSize manoeuvrability score

DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.

89%

11% less manoeuvrable than the average Sedan

108%

8% more manoeuvrable than the average Pickup

Parking

Will the 2016 Tesla Model S or 2025 Ford Maverick fit in a standard parking space?

2016 Tesla Model S parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 39 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 26.5 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

39 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

26.5 cm

2025 Ford Maverick parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 45 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 21 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

45 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

21 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize