2018 Jeep Wrangler vs 2021 Volkswagen Polo
Which is bigger, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler or 2021 Volkswagen Polo?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
The 2018 Jeep Wrangler measures an extra 16.3 cm in length, providing a slightly more substantial footprint on the road than the 2021 Volkswagen Polo. The 2018 Jeep Wrangler gains you 12.4 cm in width, likely providing extra elbow room inside compared to the 2021 Volkswagen Polo, but you'll need more caution when navigating tight city streets. Height heavily favours the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, which measures 41.7 cm taller than the 2021 Volkswagen Polo. The wheelbase on both vehicles is nearly identical, suggesting a similar level of high-speed stability.
Measurements
Length
423.7 cm (+16.3)
407.4 cm
Height
186.8 cm (+41.7)
145.1 cm
Body width
187.5 cm (+12.4)
175.1 cm
Ground clearance
24.6 cm
N/A
Wheelbase
246 cm
255.2 cm (+9.2)
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
7.9 m² (+0.8)
7.1 m²
How each car compares with its class average
Length
423.7 cm
71.7 cm shorter than the average SUV
407.4 cm
7.8 cm shorter than the average Hatchback
Height
186.8 cm
3.3 cm shorter than the average SUV
145.1 cm
2.8 cm shorter than the average Hatchback
Body width
187.5 cm
8.2 cm narrower than the average SUV
175.1 cm
1.4 cm narrower than the average Hatchback
Ground clearance
24.6 cm
2.1 cm more ground clearance than the average SUV
N/A
Wheelbase
246 cm
44.1 cm shorter wheelbase than the average SUV
255.2 cm
3.9 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Hatchback
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
7.9 m²
1.8 m² smaller footprint than the average SUV
7.1 m²
0.2 m² smaller footprint than the average Hatchback
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
The 2021 Volkswagen Polo’s confirmed 351 L (VDA) capacity is average for its class, serving as our primary reference point for this matchup. The 2021 Volkswagen Polo provides a way above average 1,125 L for the hatchback segment for cargo space with the seats down.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
351 L
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,125 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
N/A
152.7 L per m
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
N/A
87.2 L per m²
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
351 L
8 L more cargo volume than the average Hatchback
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,125 L
7 L more cargo volume than the average Hatchback
DriveSize space efficiency
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.
+5%
VDA: More space efficient than the average Hatchback
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
With 5 doors, the 2021 Volkswagen Polo offers more points of entry than the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, which typically makes loading passengers or gear into the back easier. Thanks to its extra seat, the 2021 Volkswagen Polo is able to carry one additional passenger over the 2018 Jeep Wrangler. A minor 0.1 m in turning circle separates these two, meaning they handle tight car parks almost equally. This 744 kg weight gap is massive, fundamentally changing everything from braking to suspension wear.
Measurements
Doors
2
5 (+3)
Max. seats
4
5 (+1)
Turning circle
10.5 m
10.6 m (+0.1)
Curb weight
1,801 kg (+744)
1,057 kg
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
10.5 m
1.5 m smaller turning circle than the average SUV
10.6 m
0.2 m larger turning circle than the average Hatchback
Curb weight
1,801 kg
646 kg lighter than the average SUV
1,057 kg
196 kg lighter than the average Hatchback
DriveSize manoeuvrability
DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.
+15%
More manoeuvrable than the average SUV
About average
About average for a Hatchback
Parking
Will the 2018 Jeep Wrangler or 2021 Volkswagen Polo fit in a standard parking space?
2018 Jeep Wrangler parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 43.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 63 cm at each end.
Body side clearance
43.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
63 cm
2021 Volkswagen Polo parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 49.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 71 cm at each end.
Body side clearance
49.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
71 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
What Is Wheelbase? Car Wheelbase Meaning & Why It Matters
Learn what wheelbase means, how it affects ride comfort, handling, turning circle and interior space, and why it matters when choosing your next car.
Will Your Car Fit in a Standard Parking Space? Parking Space Sizes Explained
Find out if your car will fit in a standard parking space. Compare UK, US and international parking bay sizes, and check real vehicle fit with DriveSize.
Smallest Car in the World? Peel P50 vs Today’s City Cars (Sandero, Golf & More)
How tiny is the Peel P50? See it compared to today’s city cars including the VW Golf, Toyota Corolla, Dacia Sandero, VW Polo and ID.3 in real dimensions.
What Is Ground Clearance? Why does it matter for SUVs, and which have the most
Clear explanation of SUV ground clearance, how much you really need, and which SUVs offer the most — using real measurements you can compare side-by-side on Drivesize.
More Jeeps
FAQs
Frequently asked questions
Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Jeep and Volkswagen documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.