2020 Toyota Highlander vs 2016 Tesla Model S
Which is bigger, the 2020 Toyota Highlander or 2016 Tesla Model S?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
Our data shows a near match in vehicle length, with only 2 cm between 2016 Tesla Model S and 2020 Toyota Highlander. In terms of width, there is almost nothing between them; the 2016 Tesla Model S is a mere 3.4 cm wider than the 2020 Toyota Highlander. There is no subtlety to the difference here, as the 2020 Toyota Highlander towers 28.5 cm above the 2016 Tesla Model S. The 2020 Toyota Highlander can handle deeper ruts and taller bumps thanks to its 6.3 cm clearance advantage over the 2016 Tesla Model S. The 2020 Toyota Highlander will likely be the more agile choice in tight turns, sitting 11 cm shorter between the axles than the 2016 Tesla Model S.
Measurements
Length
495 cm
497 cm (+2)
Height
173 cm (+28.5)
144.5 cm
Width (excluding mirrors)
193 cm
196.4 cm (+3.4)
Width (including mirrors)
N/A (+6.3)
218.9 cm
Ground clearance
20.3 cm
14 cm (+11)
Wheelbase
285 cm
296 cm (+0.2)
How each car compares with its class average
Length
495 cm
42.4 cm longer than the average Crossover
497 cm
24.1 cm longer than the average Sedan
Height
173 cm
10.2 cm taller than the average Crossover
144.5 cm
1.3 cm shorter than the average Sedan
Width (excluding mirrors)
193 cm
8.1 cm wider than the average Crossover
196.4 cm
13.4 cm wider than the average Sedan
Width (including mirrors)
N/A
218.9 cm
13.3 cm wider than the average Sedan
Ground clearance
20.3 cm
2.2 cm more ground clearance than the average Crossover
14 cm
Same ground clearance as the average Sedan
Wheelbase
285 cm
12.6 cm longer wheelbase than the average Crossover
296 cm
17.9 cm longer wheelbase than the average Sedan
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
Rarely do you see such a divide in cargo space. The 2016 Tesla Model S is the definitive winner for the weekly shop with the seats up, but the 2020 Toyota Highlander is the undeniable master of maximum volume with the seats down.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
453 L
745 L (+292)
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
2,387 L (+742)
1,645 L
Frunk capacity
N/A
60 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
228.3 L per m (+15)
213.3 L per m
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
118.3 L per m² (+9.7)
108.6 L per m²
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
453 L
286 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
745 L
349 L more cargo volume than the average Sedan
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
2,387 L
516 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover
1,645 L
Class benchmark unavailable.
DriveSize space efficiency score
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.
90%
SAE: below class average (-10%)
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
With 1 more door(s) than the 2016 Tesla Model S, the 2020 Toyota Highlander should be more practical for those wanting to carry passengers or luggage. Passenger space changes considerably here, as the 2020 Toyota Highlander includes 3 more seats than the 2016 Tesla Model S. The 0.9 m turning circle difference means the 2020 Toyota Highlander might clear a U-turn where the 2016 Tesla Model S requires a bit more care. The 2016 Tesla Model S adds a meaningful 147 kg of mass, which can contribute to a smoother ride over bumps.
Measurements
Doors
5 (+1)
4
Max. seats
8 (+3)
5
Turning circle
11.4 m
12.3 m (+0.9)
Curb weight
1,880 kg
2,027 kg (+147)
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
11.4 m
0.2 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover
12.3 m
1.2 m larger turning circle than the average Sedan
Curb weight
1,880 kg
248 kg heavier than the average Crossover
2,027 kg
505 kg heavier than the average Sedan
DriveSize manoeuvrability score
DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.
95%
5% less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover
89%
11% less manoeuvrable than the average Sedan
Parking
Will the 2020 Toyota Highlander or 2016 Tesla Model S fit in a standard parking space?
2020 Toyota Highlander parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 41 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 27.5 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
41 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
27.5 cm
2016 Tesla Model S parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 39 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 26.5 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
39 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
26.5 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
What Is Ground Clearance? Why does it matter for SUVs, and which have the most
Clear explanation of SUV ground clearance, how much you really need, and which SUVs offer the most — using real measurements you can compare side-by-side on Drivesize.
Best Cars for Tall Drivers in the USA (2025, with Real Interior Stats)
Find the most spacious SUVs and sedans for tall drivers in 2025, with real headroom and legroom stats plus setup tips for long-legged comfort.
FAQs