DriveSize

2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 vs 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric

Side view of the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4
Side view of the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric

Ford F‑150

Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 2024

Hyundai Kona Electric

2024

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 or 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

Measured bumper to bumper, 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 extends 96.3 cm beyond 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric, marking a substantial length advantage. At 20.3 cm wider, the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 belongs to a completely different size class, offering a potential level of shoulder room the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric can't match. There is a staggering 37.8 cm between their rooflines, with the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 looming high above the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric. The 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 clears an additional 9.9 cm from the ground, ensuring its undercarriage stays safer from the road than the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric. With a 46 cm shorter wheelbase, the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric is the clear winner for tight multi-storey car parks compared to the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4.

Measurements

Length

531.9 cm (+96.3)

435.6 cm

Height

195.3 cm (+37.8)

157.5 cm

Body width

202.9 cm (+20.3)

182.6 cm

Width including mirrors

243.1 cm (+33.1)

210 cm

Ground clearance

24.9 cm (+9.9)

15 cm

Wheelbase

311.9 cm (+46)

265.9 cm

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

10.8 m² (+2.8)

8 m²

How each car compares with its class average

Length

531.9 cm

10.8 cm shorter than the average Pickup

435.6 cm

17 cm shorter than the average Crossover

Height

195.3 cm

8.5 cm taller than the average Pickup

157.5 cm

5.3 cm shorter than the average Crossover

Body width

202.9 cm

8.5 cm wider than the average Pickup

182.6 cm

2.3 cm narrower than the average Crossover

Width including mirrors

243.1 cm

20.2 cm wider than the average Pickup

210 cm

3.6 cm wider than the average Crossover

Ground clearance

24.9 cm

2.1 cm more ground clearance than the average Pickup

15 cm

3.1 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover

Wheelbase

311.9 cm

19.1 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Pickup

265.9 cm

6.5 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

10.8 m²

0.2 m² larger footprint than the average Pickup

8 m²

0.4 m² smaller footprint than the average Crossover

Front view

Front view of the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4
Front view of the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

Rarely do you see such a divide in cargo space. The 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 is the definitive winner for the weekly shop with the seats up, but the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric is the undeniable master of maximum volume with the seats down.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

466 L

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

N/A

1,300 L

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

1,764 L (+1,042)

722 L

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,764 L

1,804 L (+40)

Frunk capacity

N/A

27 L

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

331.6 L per m (+157.6)

174 L per m

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

163.5 L per m² (+68.2)

95.3 L per m²

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

466 L

21 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

N/A

1,300 L

208 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

1,764 L

327 L more cargo volume than the average Pickup

722 L

17 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,764 L

237 L more cargo volume than the average Pickup

1,804 L

67 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

DriveSize space efficiency

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.

+33%

SAE: More space efficient than the average Pickup

-4%

VDA: Less space efficient than the average Crossover

Rear view

Rear view of the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4
Rear view of the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

With 3 more door(s) than the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4, the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric should be more practical for those wanting to carry passengers or luggage. The 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric brings a major practicality benefit, offering room for 2 more passengers than the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4. If you drive these cars, you'll notice the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric is significantly more responsive in U-turns, clearing them with 2 m to spare over the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4. The 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 is in a different weight class entirely, sitting 491 kg higher on the scales than the 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric.

Measurements

Doors

2

5 (+3)

Max. seats

3

5 (+2)

Turning circle

12.6 m (+2)

10.6 m

Curb weight

2,111 kg (+491)

1,620 kg

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

12.6 m

0.5 m smaller turning circle than the average Pickup

10.6 m

0.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Crossover

Curb weight

2,111 kg

140 kg lighter than the average Pickup

1,620 kg

12 kg lighter than the average Crossover

DriveSize manoeuvrability

DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.

+1%

More manoeuvrable than the average Pickup

+6%

More manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

Parking

Will the 2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 or 2024 Hyundai Kona Electric fit in a standard parking space?

2024 Ford F‑150 Regular Cab 6.5ft bed 4x4 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

Tight

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 36 cm per side, and length clearance is 9 cm at each end. Primary constraint: length.

Body side clearance

36 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

9 cm

Primary constraint.

2024 Hyundai Kona Electric parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 46 cm per side, and length clearance is 57 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

46 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

57 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize •

Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Ford and Hyundai documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.