2018 Jeep Wrangler vs 2024 Ford Kuga
Which is bigger, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler or 2024 Ford Kuga?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
The 2024 Ford Kuga sits 36.7 cm longer than the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, representing a noticeable step up in total length. In terms of width, there is almost nothing between them; the 2024 Ford Kuga is a mere 0.7 cm wider than the 2018 Jeep Wrangler. Standing over 18.9 cm higher, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler offers a more elevated seating position and a more commanding view of the road compared to the lower 2024 Ford Kuga. If you live in a rural area, the 2018 Jeep Wrangler's 8 cm ground clearance lead over the 2024 Ford Kuga is a major plus. The 2024 Ford Kuga has a 25.1 cm longer wheelbase, which often translates to extra "stretch-out" room in the back.
Measurements
Length
423.7 cm
460.4 cm (+36.7)
Height
186.8 cm (+18.9)
167.9 cm
Width (excluding mirrors)
187.5 cm
188.2 cm (+0.7)
Width (including mirrors)
N/A (+8)
217.7 cm
Ground clearance
24.6 cm
16.6 cm (+25.1)
Wheelbase
246 cm
271.1 cm (+0.7)
How each car compares with its class average
Length
423.7 cm
71.7 cm shorter than the average SUV
460.4 cm
7.8 cm longer than the average Crossover
Height
186.8 cm
3.3 cm shorter than the average SUV
167.9 cm
5.1 cm taller than the average Crossover
Width (excluding mirrors)
187.5 cm
8.2 cm narrower than the average SUV
188.2 cm
3.3 cm wider than the average Crossover
Width (including mirrors)
N/A
217.7 cm
11.3 cm wider than the average Crossover
Ground clearance
24.6 cm
2.1 cm more ground clearance than the average SUV
16.6 cm
1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover
Wheelbase
246 cm
44.1 cm shorter wheelbase than the average SUV
271.1 cm
1.3 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
The 2024 Ford Kuga is the only model in this pair with confirmed cargo stats, with a 412 L (VDA) capacity that is average for its class. The 2024 Ford Kuga offers 1,534 L (VDA) of total cargo volume, which is way above average for crossover.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
412 L
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,534 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
N/A
174.8 L per m
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
N/A
92.9 L per m²
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
412 L
33 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,534 L
26 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover
DriveSize space efficiency score
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.
94%
VDA: below class average (-6%)
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
With more doors, the 2024 Ford Kuga is more practical for passengers to enter and exit. With an extra seat, the 2024 Ford Kuga allows for that one additional passenger. You’ll appreciate the 0.88 m tighter turning circle of the 2018 Jeep Wrangler when navigating cramped multi-storey car parks. A 275 kg gap in curb weight is considerable, with the 2018 Jeep Wrangler likely to feel more substantial to drive than the 2024 Ford Kuga, especially under braking and when changing direction.
Measurements
Doors
2
5 (+3)
Max. seats
4
5 (+1)
Turning circle
10.5 m
11.4 m (+0.9)
Curb weight
1,801 kg (+275)
1,526 kg
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
10.5 m
1.5 m smaller turning circle than the average SUV
11.4 m
0.1 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover
Curb weight
1,801 kg
646 kg lighter than the average SUV
1,526 kg
106 kg lighter than the average Crossover
DriveSize manoeuvrability score
DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.
115%
15% more manoeuvrable than the average SUV
98%
2% less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover
Parking
Will the 2018 Jeep Wrangler or 2024 Ford Kuga fit in a standard parking space?
2018 Jeep Wrangler parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 43.5 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 63 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
43.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
63 cm
2024 Ford Kuga parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 43 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 44.5 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
43 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
44.5 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
What Is Wheelbase? Car Wheelbase Meaning & Why It Matters
Learn what wheelbase means, how it affects ride comfort, handling, turning circle and interior space, and why it matters when choosing your next car.
Car Width Explained: Body Width, Mirrors-Folded & Mirrors-Out (With Real Examples)
Car width made simple: body width, mirrors-folded and mirrors-out, with real examples from the Model Y, CR-V, Puma, Cybertruck and more.
Autobesity: Why Cars Keep Getting Bigger
Why are cars getting wider and heavier every year? Explore the rising trend of ‘autobesity,’ how it affects safety, parking, fuel use—and whether it’s here to stay.
What Is Ground Clearance? Why does it matter for SUVs, and which have the most
Clear explanation of SUV ground clearance, how much you really need, and which SUVs offer the most — using real measurements you can compare side-by-side on Drivesize.
Are modern SUVs too big for UK parking bays? We measured popular models (and what still fits)
SUV sizes keep growing — we compared six popular models against a standard UK parking bay, including mirrors-out width and overall length.
More Jeeps
FAQs