2025 Ford Maverick vs 1962 Peel P50
Which is bigger, the 2025 Ford Maverick or 1962 Peel P50?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
The figures show over 370.3 cm of separation between the 2025 Ford Maverick and 1962 Peel P50, which is a huge difference. The 2025 Ford Maverick is a staggering 85.3 cm wider than the 1962 Peel P50, we're looking at two different worlds here. The 2025 Ford Maverick is an incredible 54 cm taller, which fundamentally alters the ease of access and the total volume of the interior relative to the 1962 Peel P50. With a 8.4 cm advantage in ground clearance, the 2025 Ford Maverick is better equipped for unpaved roads and snowy conditions when compared to the 1962 Peel P50. The 2025 Ford Maverick and 1962 Peel P50 exist at opposite ends of the spectrum, separated by a huge 187.6 cm wheelbase gap.
Measurements
Length
507.5 cm (+370.3)
137.2 cm
Height
174 cm (+54)
120 cm
Width (excluding mirrors)
184.4 cm (+85.3)
99.1 cm
Width (including mirrors)
212.1 cm (+8.4)
N/A
Ground clearance
21.1 cm (+187.6)
12.7 cm
Wheelbase
307.6 cm (+8)
120 cm
How each car compares with its class average
Length
507.5 cm
35.2 cm shorter than the average Pickup
137.2 cm
161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar
Height
174 cm
12.8 cm shorter than the average Pickup
120 cm
36 cm shorter than the average Microcar
Width (excluding mirrors)
184.4 cm
10 cm narrower than the average Pickup
99.1 cm
48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar
Width (including mirrors)
212.1 cm
10.8 cm narrower than the average Pickup
N/A
Ground clearance
21.1 cm
1.7 cm less ground clearance than the average Pickup
12.7 cm
1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar
Wheelbase
307.6 cm
23.4 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Pickup
120 cm
86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
The 2025 Ford Maverick offers a known 943 L (SAE) cargo capacity with its seats up, which is way above average for pickup vehicles. The 2025 Ford Maverick provides a typical 943 L for the pickup segment for cargo space with the seats down.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
943 L
N/A
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
943 L
N/A
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
185.8 L per m
N/A
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
100.8 L per m²
N/A
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
943 L
494 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup
N/A
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
943 L
584 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup
N/A
DriveSize space efficiency score
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.
82%
SAE: below class average (-18%)
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
Passengers will appreciate the additional doors on the 2025 Ford Maverick when you're parked in tight spots, as they offer more entry options than the 1-door 1962 Peel P50. The 4-seat contrast in passenger capacity between the 2025 Ford Maverick and 1962 Peel P50 is huge. There's a total contrast in maneuverability; the 2025 Ford Maverick requires an extreme 8.54 m more room for a U-turn. You’ll feel every bit of that 1,618 kg difference when trying to accelerate or change direction in the 2025 Ford Maverick compared to 1962 Peel P50.
Measurements
Doors
4 (+3)
1
Max. seats
5 (+4)
1
Turning circle
12.2 m (+8.5)
3.7 m
Curb weight
1,677 kg (+1,618)
59 kg
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
12.2 m
0.9 m smaller turning circle than the average Pickup
3.7 m
4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar
Curb weight
1,677 kg
574 kg lighter than the average Pickup
59 kg
643 kg lighter than the average Microcar
DriveSize manoeuvrability score
DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.
108%
8% more manoeuvrable than the average Pickup
102%
2% more manoeuvrable than the average Microcar
Parking
Will the 2025 Ford Maverick or 1962 Peel P50 fit in a standard parking space?
2025 Ford Maverick parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 45 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 21 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
45 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
21 cm
1962 Peel P50 parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
87.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
206 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
Will Your Car Fit in a Standard Parking Space? Parking Space Sizes Explained
Find out if your car will fit in a standard parking space. Compare UK, US and international parking bay sizes, and check real vehicle fit with DriveSize.
Smallest Car vs the Giants: Peel P50 vs Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade & Wrangler
How tiny is the Peel P50 really? See it compared with giants like the Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade and Wrangler using real dimensions.
Smallest Car in the World? Peel P50 vs Today’s City Cars (Sandero, Golf & More)
How tiny is the Peel P50? See it compared to today’s city cars including the VW Golf, Toyota Corolla, Dacia Sandero, VW Polo and ID.3 in real dimensions.
How to Understand Car Dimensions: Length, Width, Wheelbase and More
Confused by car dimensions? Learn how length, width, height, wheelbase and ground clearance affect comfort, space and performance. The ultimate 2025 guide for smart car buyers.
FAQs