1962 Peel P50 vs 2024 Ford Puma
Which is bigger, the 1962 Peel P50 or 2024 Ford Puma?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
The 2024 Ford Puma is over 281.4 cm longer than the 1962 Peel P50, which is an enormous difference in length. The 2024 Ford Puma is an incredible 81.4 cm wider, making the 1962 Peel P50 look like a toy in comparison. Height heavily favours the 2024 Ford Puma, which measures 35 cm taller than the 1962 Peel P50. A 3.6 cm larger ground clearance gap gives the 2024 Ford Puma a slightly more capable feel when the pavement gets rough vs the 1962 Peel P50. Side-by-side, the 2024 Ford Puma’s wheelbase looks incredibly long next to the 1962 Peel P50, with 138.8 cm between them.
Measurements
Length
137.2 cm
418.6 cm (+281.4)
Height
120 cm
155 cm (+35)
Width (excluding mirrors)
99.1 cm
180.5 cm (+81.4)
Width (including mirrors)
N/A
193 cm (+3.6)
Ground clearance
12.7 cm
16.3 cm (+138.8)
Wheelbase
120 cm
258.8 cm (+6.2)
How each car compares with its class average
Length
137.2 cm
161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar
418.6 cm
34 cm shorter than the average Crossover
Height
120 cm
36 cm shorter than the average Microcar
155 cm
7.8 cm shorter than the average Crossover
Width (excluding mirrors)
99.1 cm
48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar
180.5 cm
4.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover
Width (including mirrors)
N/A
193 cm
13.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover
Ground clearance
12.7 cm
1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar
16.3 cm
1.8 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover
Wheelbase
120 cm
86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar
258.8 cm
13.6 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
The 2024 Ford Puma offers a known 456 L (VDA) cargo capacity with its seats up, which is average for crossover vehicles. The 2024 Ford Puma provides a way above average 1,216 L for the crossover segment for cargo space with the seats down.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
456 L
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,216 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
N/A
172.5 L per m
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
N/A
95.6 L per m²
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
456 L
11 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,216 L
292 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
DriveSize space efficiency score
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.
97%
VDA: below class average (-3%)
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
The 1962 Peel P50 trades the extra access points of the 2024 Ford Puma for a more cohesive and solid body design with just 1 doors. The 4-seat contrast in passenger capacity between the 2024 Ford Puma and 1962 Peel P50 is huge. There's a total contrast in maneuverability; the 2024 Ford Puma requires an extreme 6.74 m more room for a U-turn. This 1,257 kg weight gap is massive, fundamentally changing everything from braking to suspension wear.
Measurements
Doors
1
5 (+4)
Max. seats
1
5 (+4)
Turning circle
3.7 m
10.4 m (+6.7)
Curb weight
59 kg
1,316 kg (+1,257)
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
3.7 m
4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar
10.4 m
0.8 m smaller turning circle than the average Crossover
Curb weight
59 kg
643 kg lighter than the average Microcar
1,316 kg
316 kg lighter than the average Crossover
DriveSize manoeuvrability score
DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.
102%
2% more manoeuvrable than the average Microcar
109%
9% more manoeuvrable than the average Crossover
Parking
Will the 1962 Peel P50 or 2024 Ford Puma fit in a standard parking space?
1962 Peel P50 parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
87.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
206 cm
2024 Ford Puma parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 47 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 65.5 cm at each end.
Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)
47 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
65.5 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
Will Your Car Fit in a Standard Parking Space? Parking Space Sizes Explained
Find out if your car will fit in a standard parking space. Compare UK, US and international parking bay sizes, and check real vehicle fit with DriveSize.
Smallest Car vs the Giants: Peel P50 vs Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade & Wrangler
How tiny is the Peel P50 really? See it compared with giants like the Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade and Wrangler using real dimensions.
Car Width Explained: Body Width, Mirrors-Folded & Mirrors-Out (With Real Examples)
Car width made simple: body width, mirrors-folded and mirrors-out, with real examples from the Model Y, CR-V, Puma, Cybertruck and more.
Smallest Car in the World? Peel P50 vs Today’s City Cars (Sandero, Golf & More)
How tiny is the Peel P50? See it compared to today’s city cars including the VW Golf, Toyota Corolla, Dacia Sandero, VW Polo and ID.3 in real dimensions.
How to Understand Car Dimensions: Length, Width, Wheelbase and More
Confused by car dimensions? Learn how length, width, height, wheelbase and ground clearance affect comfort, space and performance. The ultimate 2025 guide for smart car buyers.
FAQs