DriveSize

1962 Peel P50 vs 2024 Ford Puma

Side view of the 2024 Ford Puma
Side view of the 1962 Peel P50

Peel P50

1962

Ford Puma

2024

Side view of the 1962 Peel P50
Change car

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 1962 Peel P50 or 2024 Ford Puma?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

The 2024 Ford Puma is over 281.4 cm longer than the 1962 Peel P50, which is an enormous difference in length. The 2024 Ford Puma is an incredible 81.4 cm wider, making the 1962 Peel P50 look like a toy in comparison. Height heavily favours the 2024 Ford Puma, which measures 35 cm taller than the 1962 Peel P50. A 3.6 cm larger ground clearance gap gives the 2024 Ford Puma a slightly more capable feel when the pavement gets rough vs the 1962 Peel P50. Side-by-side, the 2024 Ford Puma’s wheelbase looks incredibly long next to the 1962 Peel P50, with 138.8 cm between them.

Measurements

Length

137.2 cm

418.6 cm (+281.4)

Height

120 cm

155 cm (+35)

Body width

99.1 cm

180.5 cm (+81.4)

Width including mirrors

N/A

193 cm

Ground clearance

12.7 cm

16.3 cm (+3.6)

Wheelbase

120 cm

258.8 cm (+138.8)

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

1.4 m²

7.6 m² (+6.2)

How each car compares with its class average

Length

137.2 cm

161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar

418.6 cm

34 cm shorter than the average Crossover

Height

120 cm

36 cm shorter than the average Microcar

155 cm

7.8 cm shorter than the average Crossover

Body width

99.1 cm

48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar

180.5 cm

4.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover

Width including mirrors

N/A

193 cm

13.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover

Ground clearance

12.7 cm

1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar

16.3 cm

1.8 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover

Wheelbase

120 cm

86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar

258.8 cm

13.6 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

1.4 m²

3.1 m² smaller footprint than the average Microcar

7.6 m²

0.8 m² smaller footprint than the average Crossover

Front view

Front view of the 1962 Peel P50
Front view of the 2024 Ford Puma

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

The 2024 Ford Puma offers a known 456 L (VDA) cargo capacity with its seats up, which is average for crossover vehicles. The 2024 Ford Puma provides a way above average 1,216 L for the crossover segment for cargo space with the seats down.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

456 L

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

N/A

1,216 L

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

N/A

172.5 L per m

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

N/A

95.6 L per m²

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

N/A

456 L

11 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

N/A

1,216 L

292 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

DriveSize space efficiency

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.

-3%

VDA: Less space efficient than the average Crossover

Rear view

Rear view of the 1962 Peel P50
Rear view of the 2024 Ford Puma

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

The 1962 Peel P50 trades the extra access points of the 2024 Ford Puma for a more cohesive and solid body design with just 1 doors. The 4-seat contrast in passenger capacity between the 2024 Ford Puma and 1962 Peel P50 is huge. There's a total contrast in maneuverability; the 2024 Ford Puma requires an extreme 6.7 m more room for a U-turn. This 1,257 kg weight gap is massive, fundamentally changing everything from braking to suspension wear.

Measurements

Doors

1

5 (+4)

Max. seats

1

5 (+4)

Turning circle

3.7 m

10.4 m (+6.7)

Curb weight

59 kg

1,316 kg (+1,257)

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

3.7 m

4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar

10.4 m

0.8 m smaller turning circle than the average Crossover

Curb weight

59 kg

643 kg lighter than the average Microcar

1,316 kg

316 kg lighter than the average Crossover

DriveSize manoeuvrability

DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.

+2%

More manoeuvrable than the average Microcar

+9%

More manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

Parking

Will the 1962 Peel P50 or 2024 Ford Puma fit in a standard parking space?

1962 Peel P50 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

Comfortable

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

87.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

206 cm

2024 Ford Puma parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 47 cm per side, and length clearance is 65.5 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

47 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

65.5 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize •

Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Peel and Ford documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.