DriveSize

2024 Volkswagen Tiguan vs 1962 Peel P50

Side view of the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan
Side view of the 1962 Peel P50

Volkswagen Tiguan

2024

Peel P50

1962

Side view of the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan
Change car
Side view of the 1962 Peel P50
Change car

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan or 1962 Peel P50?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

With a length difference of 316.7 cm, the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan and 1962 Peel P50 are worlds apart. The 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan is an incredible 85.1 cm wider, making the 1962 Peel P50 look like a toy in comparison. There is a staggering 46 cm between their rooflines, with the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan looming high above the 1962 Peel P50. The 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan and 1962 Peel P50 exist at opposite ends of the spectrum, separated by a huge 147.6 cm wheelbase gap.

Measurements

Length

453.9 cm (+316.7)

137.2 cm

Height

166 cm (+46)

120 cm

Width (excluding mirrors)

184.2 cm (+85.1)

99.1 cm

Ground clearance

N/A (+147.6)

12.7 cm

Wheelbase

267.6 cm (+7)

120 cm

How each car compares with its class average

Length

453.9 cm

1.3 cm longer than the average Crossover

137.2 cm

161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar

Height

166 cm

3.2 cm taller than the average Crossover

120 cm

36 cm shorter than the average Microcar

Width (excluding mirrors)

184.2 cm

0.7 cm narrower than the average Crossover

99.1 cm

48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar

Ground clearance

N/A

12.7 cm

1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar

Wheelbase

267.6 cm

4.8 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover

120 cm

86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar

Front view

Front view of the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan
Front view of the 1962 Peel P50

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

The 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan has 652 L (VDA) of cargo space with its seats up, which is below average compared to the class average for microcar. The 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan has 1,650 L (VDA) of cargo space with its seats down, which is below average compared to the class average for microcar.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

652 L

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,650 L

N/A

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

220.6 L per m

N/A

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

119.8 L per m²

N/A

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (VDA)

The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

652 L

207 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

Largest cargo capacity (VDA)

The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.

If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

1,650 L

142 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

N/A

DriveSize space efficiency score

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA scores compare with VDA class averages, and SAE scores compare with SAE class averages. Around 100% means in line with class average.

121%

VDA: above class average (+21%)

Rear view

Rear view of the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan
Rear view of the 1962 Peel P50

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

The 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan offers more practicality with its 5 doors compared to the 1-door layout of the 1962 Peel P50. The difference in passenger capacity is enormous, with the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan able to carry 4 more people than the 1962 Peel P50. The 1962 Peel P50 can practically turn on a sixpence compared to the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan, which is hampered by a 8.04 m wider turning circle. If efficiency and agility are your goals, the 1962 Peel P50’s 1,651 kg less weight is an extreme advantage.

Measurements

Doors

5 (+4)

1

Max. seats

5 (+4)

1

Turning circle

11.7 m (+8)

3.7 m

Curb weight

1,710 kg (+1,651)

59 kg

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

11.7 m

0.5 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover

3.7 m

4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar

Curb weight

1,710 kg

78 kg heavier than the average Crossover

59 kg

643 kg lighter than the average Microcar

DriveSize manoeuvrability score

DriveSize manoeuvrability score combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

Around 100% means in line with the class average; higher scores indicate better manoeuvrability relative to similar cars.

97%

3% less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

102%

2% more manoeuvrable than the average Microcar

Parking

Will the 2024 Volkswagen Tiguan or 1962 Peel P50 fit in a standard parking space?

2024 Volkswagen Tiguan parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 45 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 48 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

45 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

48 cm

1962 Peel P50 parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width excluding mirrors where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

Comfortable

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side (excluding mirrors), and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.

Body side clearance (excluding mirrors)

87.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

206 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize