DriveSize

2025 Ford Maverick vs 2015 Tesla Model X

Side view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Side view of the 2015 Tesla Model X

Ford Maverick

2025

Tesla Model X

2015

Side view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Change car

Select unit of measurement:

Which is bigger, the 2025 Ford Maverick or 2015 Tesla Model X?

Key dimensions: length, width, height

With just 2.3 cm separating them, there’s little to distinguish the 2025 Ford Maverick and the 2015 Tesla Model X in terms of overall length. At 15.5 cm wider, the 2015 Tesla Model X has a noticeably broader stance than the 2025 Ford Maverick, giving it a more planted feel on the road at the cost of some agility in parking spaces. The 2025 Ford Maverick offers an extra 5.6 cm of height, providing a bit more clearance and a more upright cabin feel than the 2015 Tesla Model X. Sitting with 4 cm higher ground clearance, the 2025 Ford Maverick is better prepared for those unexpected potholes than the 2015 Tesla Model X. Even the 11.1 cm wheelbase advantage helps the 2025 Ford Maverick feel like a larger, more composed vehicle than the 2015 Tesla Model X.

Measurements

Length

507.5 cm (+2.3)

505.2 cm

Height

174 cm (+5.6)

168.4 cm

Body width

184.4 cm

199.9 cm (+15.5)

Width including mirrors

212.1 cm

227.1 cm (+15)

Ground clearance

21.1 cm (+4)

17.1 cm

Wheelbase

307.6 cm (+11.1)

296.5 cm

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

9.4 m²

10.1 m² (+0.7)

How each car compares with its class average

Length

507.5 cm

35.2 cm shorter than the average Pickup

505.2 cm

52.6 cm longer than the average Crossover

Height

174 cm

12.8 cm shorter than the average Pickup

168.4 cm

5.6 cm taller than the average Crossover

Body width

184.4 cm

10 cm narrower than the average Pickup

199.9 cm

15 cm wider than the average Crossover

Width including mirrors

212.1 cm

10.8 cm narrower than the average Pickup

227.1 cm

20.7 cm wider than the average Crossover

Ground clearance

21.1 cm

1.7 cm less ground clearance than the average Pickup

17.1 cm

1 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover

Wheelbase

307.6 cm

23.4 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Pickup

296.5 cm

24.1 cm longer wheelbase than the average Crossover

Footprint

DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.

9.4 m²

1.2 m² smaller footprint than the average Pickup

10.1 m²

1.7 m² larger footprint than the average Crossover

Front view

Front view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Front view of the 2015 Tesla Model X

Cargo Capacity: which has more space?

Standard and largest cargo capacity

Rarely do you see such a divide in cargo space. The 2025 Ford Maverick is the definitive winner for the weekly shop with the seats up, but the 2015 Tesla Model X is the undeniable master of maximum volume with the seats down.

Measurements

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

943 L (+586)

357 L

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

943 L

2,166 L (+1,223)

Frunk capacity

N/A

187 L

Cargo space vs length

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

185.8 L per m

196 L per m (+10.2)

Cargo space vs footprint

This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.

It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.

100.8 L per m² (+2.8)

98 L per m²

How each car compares with its class average

Standard cargo capacity (SAE)

The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.

943 L

494 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup

357 L

382 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover

Largest cargo capacity (SAE)

The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.

If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.

943 L

584 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup

2,166 L

295 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover

DriveSize space efficiency

DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.

Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.

VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.

-18%

SAE: Less space efficient than the average Pickup

-25%

SAE: Less space efficient than the average Crossover

Rear view

Rear view of the 2025 Ford Maverick
Rear view of the 2015 Tesla Model X

Details

Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability

With 5 doors, the 2015 Tesla Model X offers more points of entry than the 2025 Ford Maverick, which typically makes loading passengers or gear into the back easier. With 2 more seats, the 2015 Tesla Model X is better suited to carrying more people than the 2025 Ford Maverick. The maneuverability is nearly the same, with the 2025 Ford Maverick holding a slim 0.1 m turning circle advantage.

Measurements

Doors

4

5 (+1)

Max. seats

5

7 (+2)

Turning circle

12.2 m

12.3 m (+0.1)

Curb weight

1,677 kg

N/A

How each car compares with its class average

Turning circle

12.2 m

0.9 m smaller turning circle than the average Pickup

12.3 m

1.1 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover

Curb weight

1,677 kg

574 kg lighter than the average Pickup

N/A

DriveSize manoeuvrability

DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.

A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.

+8%

More manoeuvrable than the average Pickup

-11%

Less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover

Parking

Will the 2025 Ford Maverick or 2015 Tesla Model X fit in a standard parking space?

2025 Ford Maverick parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 45 cm per side, and length clearance is 21 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

45 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

21 cm

2015 Tesla Model X parking fit score

DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.

Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.

Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.

OK

For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 37.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 22 cm at each end.

Body side clearance

37.5 cm

Length clearance (at each end)

22 cm

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

By DriveSize •

Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Ford and Tesla documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.