1962 Peel P50 vs 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E
Which is bigger, the 1962 Peel P50 or 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is over 334.1 cm longer than the 1962 Peel P50, which is an enormous difference in length. The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is 89 cm wider, representing an extreme jump in size that fundamentally changes where you can physically drive. The height contrast is vast; the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E stands a massive 42.5 cm taller than the 1962 Peel P50, completely changing the perspective from the driver's seat. For all practical purposes, the ground clearance is the same between the vehicles, with just a minor 1.8 cm advantage in the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E. The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is a massive 178.4 cm longer in the wheelbase, offering a vast interior compared to the 1962 Peel P50.
Measurements
Length
137.2 cm
471.3 cm (+334.1)
Height
120 cm
162.5 cm (+42.5)
Body width
99.1 cm
188.1 cm (+89)
Width including mirrors
N/A
209.7 cm
Ground clearance
12.7 cm
14.5 cm (+1.8)
Wheelbase
120 cm
298.4 cm (+178.4)
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
1.4 m²
8.9 m² (+7.5)
How each car compares with its class average
Length
137.2 cm
161.7 cm shorter than the average Microcar
471.3 cm
18.7 cm longer than the average Crossover
Height
120 cm
36 cm shorter than the average Microcar
162.5 cm
0.3 cm shorter than the average Crossover
Body width
99.1 cm
48.2 cm narrower than the average Microcar
188.1 cm
3.2 cm wider than the average Crossover
Width including mirrors
N/A
209.7 cm
3.3 cm wider than the average Crossover
Ground clearance
12.7 cm
1.5 cm less ground clearance than the average Microcar
14.5 cm
3.6 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover
Wheelbase
120 cm
86.7 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Microcar
298.4 cm
26 cm longer wheelbase than the average Crossover
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
1.4 m²
3.1 m² smaller footprint than the average Microcar
8.9 m²
0.5 m² larger footprint than the average Crossover
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E features a 402 L (VDA) boot with the seats up, which is below average for its category. The 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E's 1,420 L (VDA) capacity with the seats down is way above average for its segment.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
402 L
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,420 L
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
822 L
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,689 L
Frunk capacity
N/A
81 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
N/A
160.9 L per m
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
N/A
85.5 L per m²
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
402 L
43 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,420 L
88 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
822 L
83 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,689 L
182 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
DriveSize space efficiency
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.
-13%
VDA: Less space efficient than the average Crossover
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
Choosing the 1962 Peel P50 means managing with 4 fewer door(s), but this usually means a cleaner looking side profile than the 5-door 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E. With a 4-seat advantage, the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E is clearly built to carry far larger groups than the 1962 Peel P50. If you drive both cars, you'll feel the extreme 7.9 m turning circle difference every time you try to park the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E in a standard bay. If efficiency and agility are your goals, the 1962 Peel P50’s 1,910 kg less weight is an extreme advantage.
Measurements
Doors
1
5 (+4)
Max. seats
1
5 (+4)
Turning circle
3.7 m
11.6 m (+7.9)
Curb weight
59 kg
1,969 kg (+1,910)
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
3.7 m
4.6 m smaller turning circle than the average Microcar
11.6 m
0.4 m larger turning circle than the average Crossover
Curb weight
59 kg
643 kg lighter than the average Microcar
1,969 kg
337 kg heavier than the average Crossover
DriveSize manoeuvrability
DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.
+2%
More manoeuvrable than the average Microcar
-4%
Less manoeuvrable than the average Crossover
Parking
Will the 1962 Peel P50 or 2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E fit in a standard parking space?
1962 Peel P50 parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 87.5 cm per side, and length clearance is 206 cm at each end.
Body side clearance
87.5 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
206 cm
2021 Ford Mustang Mach‑E parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 43 cm per side, and length clearance is 39 cm at each end.
Body side clearance
43 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
39 cm
Articles featuring these cars
View all
Will Your Car Fit in a Standard Parking Space? Parking Space Sizes Explained
Find out if your car will fit in a standard parking space. Compare UK, US and international parking bay sizes, and check real vehicle fit with DriveSize.
Smallest Car vs the Giants: Peel P50 vs Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade & Wrangler
How tiny is the Peel P50 really? See it compared with giants like the Cybertruck, F-150, Land Cruiser, Palisade and Wrangler using real dimensions.
Smallest Car in the World? Peel P50 vs Today’s City Cars (Sandero, Golf & More)
How tiny is the Peel P50? See it compared to today’s city cars including the VW Golf, Toyota Corolla, Dacia Sandero, VW Polo and ID.3 in real dimensions.
Are modern SUVs too big for UK parking bays? We measured popular models (and what still fits)
SUV sizes keep growing — we compared six popular models against a standard UK parking bay using each vehicle’s width including mirrors and overall length.
How to Understand Car Dimensions: Length, Width, Wheelbase and More
Confused by car dimensions? Learn how length, width, height, wheelbase and ground clearance affect comfort, space and performance. The ultimate 2025 guide for smart car buyers.
FAQs
Frequently asked questions
Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Peel and Ford documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.