2024 Ford Puma vs 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4
Which is bigger, the 2024 Ford Puma or 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4?
Key dimensions: length, width, height
With a difference of 170.7 cm, the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 sits in a completely different length bracket to the 2024 Ford Puma. If you have a narrow garage, take note as the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 is 22.4 cm wider than the 2024 Ford Puma, which could make for a tighter squeeze. The 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 is an incredible 40.8 cm taller, which fundamentally alters the ease of access and the total volume of the interior relative to the 2024 Ford Puma. The 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 clears obstacles by an extra 8.6 cm, making the 2024 Ford Puma look quite low to the ground in comparison. The 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 features a significantly longer wheelbase at 110.5 cm more than the 2024 Ford Puma, marking a potential leap in vehicle size.
Measurements
Length
418.6 cm
589.3 cm (+170.7)
Height
155 cm
195.8 cm (+40.8)
Body width
180.5 cm
202.9 cm (+22.4)
Width including mirrors
193 cm
243.1 cm (+50.1)
Ground clearance
16.3 cm
24.9 cm (+8.6)
Wheelbase
258.8 cm
369.3 cm (+110.5)
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
7.6 m²
12 m² (+4.4)
How each car compares with its class average
Length
418.6 cm
34 cm shorter than the average Crossover
589.3 cm
46.6 cm longer than the average Pickup
Height
155 cm
7.8 cm shorter than the average Crossover
195.8 cm
9 cm taller than the average Pickup
Body width
180.5 cm
4.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover
202.9 cm
8.5 cm wider than the average Pickup
Width including mirrors
193 cm
13.4 cm narrower than the average Crossover
243.1 cm
20.2 cm wider than the average Pickup
Ground clearance
16.3 cm
1.8 cm less ground clearance than the average Crossover
24.9 cm
2.1 cm more ground clearance than the average Pickup
Wheelbase
258.8 cm
13.6 cm shorter wheelbase than the average Crossover
369.3 cm
38.3 cm longer wheelbase than the average Pickup
Footprint
DriveSize footprint is overall length multiplied by body width.
7.6 m²
0.8 m² smaller footprint than the average Crossover
12 m²
1.4 m² larger footprint than the average Pickup
Front view
Cargo Capacity: which has more space?
Standard and largest cargo capacity
These two cars follow different measurement methods: SAE for the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 and VDA for the 2024 Ford Puma, so instead of a direct cargo space comparison, segment averages are the best way to gauge their relative utility. The 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4’s 1,495 L capacity with seats up is way above average for its class, and the 2024 Ford Puma’s 456 L capacity is average for its class. Because these two models use different measurement standards (VDA vs SAE) for total cargo volume, they can't be directly compared. But for context, the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 maximum capacity is typical for its class.
Measurements
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
456 L
N/A
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
1,216 L
N/A
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
1,495 L
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,495 L
Cargo space vs length
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by overall vehicle length.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
172.5 L per m
253.7 L per m (+81.2)
Cargo space vs footprint
This DriveSize metric divides blended cargo volume by footprint.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure, using VDA where available and SAE otherwise.
It helps show how efficiently a car turns exterior area into usable cargo space.
95.6 L per m²
125 L per m² (+29.4)
How each car compares with its class average
Standard cargo capacity (VDA)
The standard cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
456 L
11 L more cargo volume than the average Crossover
N/A
Largest cargo capacity (VDA)
The largest cargo capacity using VDA, the method commonly used globally.
If only one VDA figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
1,216 L
292 L less cargo volume than the average Crossover
N/A
Standard cargo capacity (SAE)
The standard cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
This is the manufacturer's normal published figure; it does not imply a particular seat configuration.
N/A
1,495 L
58 L more cargo volume than the average Pickup
Largest cargo capacity (SAE)
The largest cargo capacity using SAE, the method commonly used in the US.
If only one SAE figure is published, the standard and largest values are the same.
N/A
1,495 L
32 L less cargo volume than the average Pickup
DriveSize space efficiency
DriveSize space efficiency compares blended cargo volume per square meter of footprint with the class average.
Blended cargo uses 65% of the standard figure and 35% of the largest figure within the selected cargo measurement method.
VDA values compare with VDA class averages, and SAE values compare with SAE class averages. Positive percentages indicate more space efficiency and negative percentages indicate less.
-3%
VDA: Less space efficient than the average Crossover
+2%
SAE: More space efficient than the average Pickup
Rear view
Details
Doors, seats, weight, maneuverability
The 2024 Ford Puma offers more practicality with its 5 doors compared to the 4-door layout of the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4. Thanks to its extra seat, the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 is able to carry one additional passenger over the 2024 Ford Puma. The 2024 Ford Puma can practically turn on a sixpence compared to the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4, which is hampered by a 4.2 m wider turning circle. From an agility perspective, the 2024 Ford Puma wins by a landslide, weighing 925 kg less than the 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4.
Measurements
Doors
5 (+1)
4
Max. seats
5
6 (+1)
Turning circle
10.4 m
14.6 m (+4.2)
Curb weight
1,316 kg
2,241 kg (+925)
How each car compares with its class average
Turning circle
10.4 m
0.8 m smaller turning circle than the average Crossover
14.6 m
1.5 m larger turning circle than the average Pickup
Curb weight
1,316 kg
316 kg lighter than the average Crossover
2,241 kg
10 kg lighter than the average Pickup
DriveSize manoeuvrability
DriveSize manoeuvrability combines turning circle and footprint, with turning circle weighted more heavily.
A positive percentage means more manoeuvrable than the class average and a negative percentage means less manoeuvrable.
+9%
More manoeuvrable than the average Crossover
-12%
Less manoeuvrable than the average Pickup
Parking
Will the 2024 Ford Puma or 2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 fit in a standard parking space?
2024 Ford Puma parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: body side clearance is 47 cm per side, and length clearance is 65.5 cm at each end.
Body side clearance
47 cm
Length clearance (at each end)
65.5 cm
2024 Ford F‑150 SuperCrew 5.5ft bed 4x4 parking fit score
DriveSize compares the car's width and length with typical parking-space sizes by region.
Vehicle dimensions are rounded up and available side or length clearance is rounded down.
Side clearance is based on body width where available; real spaces can vary because of mirrors, walls, pillars, kerbs, bay markings, and nearby cars.
For an average USA / Canada space: exceeds the bay's length by 40 cm.
Body side clearance
36 cm
Length over bay
40 cm
Overall length. Primary constraint.
Articles featuring these cars
View all
Will Your Car Fit in a Standard Parking Space? Parking Space Sizes Explained
Find out if your car will fit in a standard parking space. Compare UK, US and international parking bay sizes, and check real vehicle fit with DriveSize.
Car width explained: Body width, width with mirrors folded & width including mirrors (with real examples)
Car width made simple: body width, width with mirrors folded and width including mirrors, with real examples from the Model Y, CR-V, Puma, Cybertruck and more.
Ford F-150 Cab & Bed Sizes Explained: Regular Cab vs SuperCab vs SuperCrew
Understand Ford F-150 SuperCrew, SuperCab and Regular Cab sizes, bed lengths, passenger space, footprint and turning circle.
Ford F-150 vs Tesla Cybertruck: Dimensions, Bed Sizes, Width & Parking
We compare the Ford F-150 and Tesla Cybertruck on size, width, bed length, and parking practicality. See which pickup fits your driveway best — with real dimensions, wheelbase, and turning circle data from Drivesize.
FAQs
Frequently asked questions
Vehicle specifications on this page are sourced from official Ford documentation. Unless the page identifies a specific trim, body style, powertrain or market version, DriveSize uses manufacturer-published specifications for the base model as its default reference. DriveSize standardises the published measurements and calculates the comparisons and derived figures shown. Figures can vary by market, model year, trim, powertrain, wheels, tyres and measurement method. How DriveSize sources and calculates these figures.